<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Management Myth #6: I Have to be the Technical Star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/management-myth-6-i-have-to-be-the-technical-star.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/management-myth-6-i-have-to-be-the-technical-star.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/management-myth-6-i-have-to-be-the-technical-star.html/comment-page-1#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8126#comment-193</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with the point you make. However, here&#039;s a situation that I once found difficult to deal with as a non-technical-star manager:
I managed a team of specialist engineers and technicians providing a service to the rest of the organisation. We had a very technically competent (PhD) guy who was knocking on the door of management, and who questioned my decisions at every turn. I would defer to him for advice on technical matters but because he had mangerial talents himself, was intensely political AND was a technical star, he was able to take the team with him, which took away my credibility as a manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with the point you make. However, here&#8217;s a situation that I once found difficult to deal with as a non-technical-star manager:<br />
I managed a team of specialist engineers and technicians providing a service to the rest of the organisation. We had a very technically competent (PhD) guy who was knocking on the door of management, and who questioned my decisions at every turn. I would defer to him for advice on technical matters but because he had mangerial talents himself, was intensely political AND was a technical star, he was able to take the team with him, which took away my credibility as a manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2005/08/management-myth-6-i-have-to-be-the-technical-star.html/comment-page-1#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8126#comment-192</guid>
		<description>There is good book by Patrick McKenna and David Maister called &quot;First Among Equals: How to Manage a Group of Professionals&quot; that deals with this subject.  It provides some good guidelines for moving from peer to manager and specifically talks about highly educated people who can be difficult to manage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is good book by Patrick McKenna and David Maister called &#8220;First Among Equals: How to Manage a Group of Professionals&#8221; that deals with this subject.  It provides some good guidelines for moving from peer to manager and specifically talks about highly educated people who can be difficult to manage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

