<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m the Queen of the Non-Career Enhancing Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2006/11/im-the-queen-of-the-non-career-enhancing-conversation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2006/11/im-the-queen-of-the-non-career-enhancing-conversation.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asher Sterkin</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2006/11/im-the-queen-of-the-non-career-enhancing-conversation.html/comment-page-1#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Asher Sterkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8022#comment-488</guid>
		<description>We all love you as you are, so please, do not change too much.It might be sometimes a mistake to jump with a snap conclusion. The &quot;Blink&quot; book provides a lot of insight about this. However speaking more technically the question is what would be the most effective way for a consultant to advertise herself minimising the risk of e-mail and telephone spam? How could you effectively filter out all these &quot;please pay me&quot; and to get stright to &quot;I want to pay you&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all love you as you are, so please, do not change too much.It might be sometimes a mistake to jump with a snap conclusion. The &#8220;Blink&#8221; book provides a lot of insight about this. However speaking more technically the question is what would be the most effective way for a consultant to advertise herself minimising the risk of e-mail and telephone spam? How could you effectively filter out all these &#8220;please pay me&#8221; and to get stright to &#8220;I want to pay you&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonR</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2006/11/im-the-queen-of-the-non-career-enhancing-conversation.html/comment-page-1#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>JonR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8022#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Not your fault. It was their choice to work for a consumer finance company. Your instinctively negative response to them has a direct causal link back to their employer&#039;s parasitic business practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not your fault. It was their choice to work for a consumer finance company. Your instinctively negative response to them has a direct causal link back to their employer&#8217;s parasitic business practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2006/11/im-the-queen-of-the-non-career-enhancing-conversation.html/comment-page-1#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8022#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I think you are being too hard on yourself, too.  Your instincts save you time 99% of the time.  Just because the 1% comes up, doesn&#039;t mean you should change to a lower performing model.
On the otherhand, the non-angry &quot;what is this regarding?&quot; approach doesn&#039;t cost anything more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are being too hard on yourself, too.  Your instincts save you time 99% of the time.  Just because the 1% comes up, doesn&#8217;t mean you should change to a lower performing model.<br />
On the otherhand, the non-angry &#8220;what is this regarding?&#8221; approach doesn&#8217;t cost anything more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2006/11/im-the-queen-of-the-non-career-enhancing-conversation.html/comment-page-1#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=8022#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Good post, but maybe you&#039;re being a little too hard on yourself. I think it&#039;s unprofessional and rude to call people using a speaker phone. If the Nice Person calls a lot of people on the speaker phone, and identifies herself as being from some mega-corp that sometimes annoys consumers, I bet that Nice Person frequently gets the same reaction from others too. But I liked your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, but maybe you&#8217;re being a little too hard on yourself. I think it&#8217;s unprofessional and rude to call people using a speaker phone. If the Nice Person calls a lot of people on the speaker phone, and identifies herself as being from some mega-corp that sometimes annoys consumers, I bet that Nice Person frequently gets the same reaction from others too. But I liked your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

