<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strengthening Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html</link>
	<description>Management, especially good management, is hard to do. This blog is for people who want to think about how they manage people, projects, and risk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lb</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>lb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=7980#comment-567</guid>
		<description>nice article. i love how you struck out the weak and indirect words.
my favourite words to kill are any that end with &quot;-ly&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article. i love how you struck out the weak and indirect words.<br />
my favourite words to kill are any that end with &#8220;-ly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=7980#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I just completed a 16 session intensive course on &quot;Mastering English Grammer and Punctuation.&quot;  I&#039;m a native English speaker and thought I was a good writer.  The course was hard work; it reminded me  how much I had forgotten, and my writing improved significantly.
I recommend grammar girl at http://grammar.qdnow.com/ .
Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just completed a 16 session intensive course on &#8220;Mastering English Grammer and Punctuation.&#8221;  I&#8217;m a native English speaker and thought I was a good writer.  The course was hard work; it reminded me  how much I had forgotten, and my writing improved significantly.<br />
I recommend grammar girl at <a href="http://grammar.qdnow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://grammar.qdnow.com/</a> .<br />
Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Schophuizen</title>
		<link>http://www.jrothman.com/blog/mpd/2007/04/strengthening-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Schophuizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrothman.com/blog/mpd/?p=7980#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I have struggled with the same. My words are &quot;And&quot;, &quot;But&quot;, &quot;So&quot;,&quot;Now&quot;, &quot;Therefore&quot; and many more.
(But) I am not an native English speaker, or writer. My fear is to break the flow of reading, making text &quot;square&quot;, not fluid.
Your examples illustrate the opposite. Instead of disrupting the flow, those extra words seem like someone is talking without taking a breath between the sentences. As a listener you get out of breath listening. Removing those words is like adding bars to music: it structures the blur of sound.
(But) Reviewing ones own writing may be a natural thing for bookwriters (and article writers), but engineers are more interested in the information content than the information format. How can we teach technical people to be/become more considerate about the reader of their writing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have struggled with the same. My words are &#8220;And&#8221;, &#8220;But&#8221;, &#8220;So&#8221;,&#8221;Now&#8221;, &#8220;Therefore&#8221; and many more.<br />
(But) I am not an native English speaker, or writer. My fear is to break the flow of reading, making text &#8220;square&#8221;, not fluid.<br />
Your examples illustrate the opposite. Instead of disrupting the flow, those extra words seem like someone is talking without taking a breath between the sentences. As a listener you get out of breath listening. Removing those words is like adding bars to music: it structures the blur of sound.<br />
(But) Reviewing ones own writing may be a natural thing for bookwriters (and article writers), but engineers are more interested in the information content than the information format. How can we teach technical people to be/become more considerate about the reader of their writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

